Monday, June 4, 2012

How A Rogue Trader's Denial May BackFire


According to the good folks at Bloomberg Jerome Kerviel began his fight today against a 2010 conviction for Societe Generale SA (GLE)’s 4.9 billion- euro ($6.2 billion) trading loss, telling a Paris appeals court that the bank knew about his actions.

His lawyers said they’ll show judges at the four-week appeal starting today that the bank knew before the 2008 trading loss that he was exceeding his mandate with risky bets and can’t claim to be an innocent victim.

 “I think that I’m not responsible for this loss,” Kerviel told judge Mireille Filippini at the start of the hearing today in response to a question about why he was appealing. “I always acted with the knowledge” of the bank.

Kerviel’s stance is similar to the defense he used with his previous legal team when the court held him responsible, sentenced him to three years in jail and ordered him to repay the loss. Those arguments aren’t likely to impress the appellate judges, said....


Read all about it at http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-06-03/kerviel-s-refusal-to-be-scapegoat-may-harm-appeal-chances.html

No comments:

Post a Comment