Thursday, June 28, 2012

Should J.P. Morgan's Jamie Dimon be history?




From Fortune: Amid reports from the New York Times that J.P. Morgan's London unit trade losses could climb as high as $9 billion, some are wondering whether it's time to seriously reconsider CEO Jamie Dimon's fate at the bank. 

"Dimon has either failed to supervise, failed to tell the truth, or both. Pleading ignorance doesn't help," Tufts University business professor Amar Bhide told me. Bhide believes the board should fire Dimon, saying Dimon's tenure can be characterized by "repeated incidents that exemplify an absence of the duty of care, which impacts the public good."

Some might argue that concern over Dimon's behavior and J.P. Morgan's (JPM) activities are overblown. But, according to the recently published Bank for International Settlements' annual report, while banks may "appear well capitalized," they "remain highly leveraged," holding "outsize derivatives positions." Both high leverage and the use of trading as "a major source of income … are moving the financial sector towards the same high-risk profile it had before the crisis," the report stated. "Recent heavy losses related to derivatives trading are a reminder of the dangers…."

http://management.fortune.cnn.com/2012/06/28/jp-morgan-jamie-dimon/?iid=SF_F_River

No comments:

Post a Comment