It’s a mind-boggling question to consider given one company’s unduplicated success during the past decade and the other’s sad-sack reputation: But today the argument could be made that Citigroup Inc. may be a better investment than Goldman Sachs Group Inc., at least according to MarketWatch
Consider that Citi on Friday reported a $3.34 billion second-quarter profit that represents a 24% increase against the same quarter last year. Goldman GS +0.21% , which reports later this month, will have to turn around what has been a string of lackluster-to-disappointing earnings announcements.
Both stocks are down year-to-date along with the battered banking sector. Citi shares are off about 17%. Goldman shares have tumbled roughly 25%. Citi is trading at 0.7-times book value with a 6% return on equity. Goldman at 0.97-times book value with a 10.4% return on equity.
One could argue that Goldman is actually overvalued given the huge litigation exposure it has stemming from the sale of mortgage securities. And a case could be made that Citi is actually undervalued given its global diversification, new management and the fact it has profit-eating baggage from the financial crisis.
More importantly, Citi is catching up to Goldman when it comes to creating profit. Citi has more potential and few expectations; it’s the other way around……
Find out more at http://www.marketwatch.com/story/is-citi-a-better-buy-than-goldman-2011-07-15?mod=MWCommentaryandBlogs&mod=marketwatch
No comments:
Post a Comment